PayTM Camouflaging its Own Non-Compliance: Vodafone Submits Before Delhi High Court

Your Opinion: How long do you think it will take to find a Covid-19 vaccine and get the entire country vaccinated?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Vodafone filed an affidavit in a case heard by the Delhi High Court. Paytm filed the petition against telecom networks for not taking any action against the phishing activities. Being that, the petition sought the protection of its customers from phishing activities. Moreover, the plea alleged that various service providers host such activities on their platforms.

However, the affidavit by Vodafone stated that the allegations are misconceived; further pleading the court to dismiss the petition. The Division Bench consisted of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan.

Contentions by Vodafone

Vodafone’s counsel argued against the cause of action for filing the petition. It relates to the events and time when petitioners were themselves not registered on the Distributed Ledgers Technology platform. DLT is India’s first and the World’s largest user of blockchain technology in telecommunications. Moreover, the petitioner approached the Deputy Commissioner of Police; which implies alternate remedy is available, like suing for Intellectual Property Rights violations.

Furthermore, telecom networks cannot either legally or practically access, exercise control, or adjudge the communicated data; whether fraudulent or not. The telecom networks have to face widespread ramifications of DLT. Moreover, Vodafone asserts that the petition tries to camouflage their own non-compliance with the RBI Directions, 2017.

Paytm’s Affidavit

Prior to this, Paytm filled an affidavit on June 24, 2020; it explained the developments which took place. The affidavit highlighted the unabated continuance of Unsolicited Commercial Communications through unregistered telemarketers. Adding to it, the Respondent telecoms assigned headers and SMS content templates similar to that of the petitioners. The affidavit asserted that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India issued directions under Section 13 of the TRAI Act, 1997. The directions sought a list of headers and associated principle entities by the telcoms. Furthermore, TRAI published an Information Note to the Press on June 22, 2020. Being that, it called for the identification of principle entries involved in sending commercial communication.

0 0
Avatar
Shriya Katariahttp://lexinsider.com
A writer by day and a reader by night. I am a Lawyer in making and a lifelong humanitarian. My enthusiasm for content writing and public speaking is real and undeniable. When not writing, I'm either painting or busy with my slam poetry.

Get Our Monthly Digest Delivered Straight To Your Inbox

CONTINUE READING

ASHA: Frontline Workers Sidelined by Authorities in COVID-19

0
An accredited social health activist, commonly referred to as ASHA; refers to a community health worker the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare instituted as a part of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM). One of the key components of the National Rural Health Mission is to provide every village in...

ECA Amendment 2020: A Blessing in Disguise?

0
Day to Day commodities of daily household no longer essential commodities

Umar Khalid -Mastermind Behind the Delhi riots, 2020?

0
In New Delhi, a human rights activist and former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student, Umar Khalid, was arrested by the Police's special cell under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) and sent to judicial custody till October 22 2020,for his alleged role in the riots...

Reliance Facebook Deal vis-à-vis the Controversial Farmers’ Bills 2020

0
Reliance Facebook Deal - Background The Modi government’s ideology visibly encompasses towards privatization and pro-corporatization. The recent farmers' bills set in motion by the NDA government are on the same lines given the Reliance-Facebook Deal. Given the importance of these reforms and the...

Farmers Reforms 2020 – The Outrage Explained

0
The Rajya Sabha on 20 September 2020 passed two agricultural bills despite huge backlash from farmers of various states. The Lok Sabha had passed these bills on 17 September 2020. The Centre had promulgated three ordinances on June 25 which is the cause of these protests. After the beginning of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, the government introduced three Bills to replace these ordinances.

The ‘Flushed’ reality behind Toilet Construction

0
A Survey conducted by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) revealed that about 40% of the toilets in the government schools, built as a result of the Swachh Vidhalaya inititative, were partially constructed, unutilized or did not exist at all. Under the...