Apex Court Hears Petition Against Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Order on the State Election Commissioner

The Supreme Court on June 10, 2020, refused to stay Andhra Pradesh Government’s challenge against the Andhra Pradesh High Court order reinstating N Ramesh Kumar as State Election Commissioner.

The Ordinance in Question

The ordinance Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 passed on April 10 made the following changes:

  • Firstly, only the appointment of a retired High Court Judge as the State Election Commissioner. Prior to the amendment, a retired bureaucrat could hold the post;
  • Secondly, reducing the term of the SEC from five years to three years;
  • Thirdly, the termination of the term of the existing SEC;
  • Fourthly, the appointment of a new SEC.

The passing of this ordinance led to termination of N Ramesh Kumar’s term despite of his appointment for 5 years. Retired Madras High Court judge, Justice (retd.) V Kanagraj was appointed as the new SEC, in his place.

The Order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court

On May 29, the high court had struck down the Ordinance the Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy government passed on April 10. The Bench of Chief Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice M Sathyanarayana Murthy stated that it violates the “test of rationality and reasonableness” specified in Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Therefore, this decision of the High Court led to the reinstatement Dr N Ramesh Kumar as the State Election Commissioner, who had to leave the post on April 10 due to the passing of the ordinance.

Arguments by the Andhra Pradesh Government

Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi, Shyam Diwan and Rakesh Dwivedi represented the State Government. Senior Counsel Harish Salve, CA Vaidyanathan and PS Narasimha represented Ramesh Kumar. The State asserted before the Apex Court that these changes were imposed to make the functioning of the State Election Commission transparent and efficient.

The State contented that the High Court order was flawed as the Governor has the power of appointing the SEC. Moreover, it is stated in the Articles 243K(1) and 243ZA of the Constitution; that the Governor has the power of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers and not otherwise.

Supreme Court’s Decision

The Bench consisted of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy. The Apex Court questioned Andhra Pradesh Government’s  motives to pass such an ordinance believing that the motives were not innocent.

Chief Justice Bobde remarked, “We are not satisfied that your motives were entirely innocent. How can you pass an ordinance like this?”

The Court then refused to pass a stay order on the High Court’s decision. Also, the court has asked for a response from the State Election Commission. The matter will be next heard after two weeks.

Ishan Harlalka
Ishan Harlalkahttp://lexinsider.com
I am a 3rd year law aspirant pursuing BA LLB. I am deeply interested in learning and am always looking forward to gain knowledge about new subjects. In my leisure time, I try to read books of various genres and by different authors. As people from non-law background may find it difficult to understand legal provisions and jargons, I try to write in a way that my articles are easy to comprehend and after reading them, one can discuss them with others.


The case of Aruna Shanbaug that changed the Euthanasia laws...

It is my Belief that death is a friend to whom we should be grateful, for it frees us from the manifold ills which are our lot - Mahatma Gandhi. As human beings, out the umpteen desires that we have, one of them is definitely to have a peaceful death....

Justice D Y Chandrachud’s path-breaking Verdict in the Sabarimala Case of...

“Will the quest for equality and fraternity be denuded of its content where women continue to be treated as children of a lesser god in exercising their liberties in matters of belief, faith and worship? Will the pursuit of individual dignity be capable of being achieved if we deny...

After repealing section 377, its time to Legalise Same-Sex Marriage in...

A draconian, archaic law that criminalized homosexuality was struck down in a historic judgment given by the Supreme Court in 2018. Two years after the judgment, the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer) community has now sought legal recognition of their relationships. As the social stigmas surrounding the LGBTQ...

Modern Day Book Burning a.k.a Internet Shutdowns

The internet has become an indispensable element in our society for all the obvious reasons. For the majority of users, not a single day goes by where we don't 'need' the internet and the lack of a reliable and fast connection can feel paralyzing. An internet shutdown refers to...

Letter to UNHRC – Dr Kafeel Khan, Punished Because He’s Muslim

Kafeel Khan, a doctor by profession and a social activist has been targeted by Yogi Government since 2017, in 3 years he had been maliciously arrested 3 times & imprisoned for around 14 months on the false charges set up against him at many instances. Now he is absolved...

Prison Life In India and its Aftermath

Everyone prays to never see the bars of prison in their lifetime. Yet, as fickle as life is, it is quite hard to predict the future. It is in everyone’s benefit to know a little bit about prison life; for movies and cinemas do not do justice to the...