Supreme Court asks Tablighi Petitioners to Approach Respective High Courts

The Supreme Court on July 2, 2020, heard a plea which questioned the Ministry of Home Affairs blacklisting of foreign nationals. Because of involvement in Tablighi Jamaat activities at Delhi’s Nizammuddin Markaz in March.

Contentions of Tablighi Members

Explicitly, the petitioners, assert that this blacklisting caused registrations of FIRs against them. This also led them to forfeit their passports to the State Administration. Thus, they contend that this is a complete deprivation of personal liberty, with no compliance with the laws. In fact, one of the petitioners is in the seventh month of her pregnancy. She was quarantined in March and released in May. Still, she is confined in a facility and not allowed to go back home.

The petitioners claim that the actions of the Government were baseless and passed on a mere presumption; without any proof that they violated the conditions of their validly granted visas. That is, under the relevant sections of the Foreigners Act, 1946 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

The petition points out the government nowhere mentions; the prohibited Tablighi activities and what caused the violation of conditions of validly granted visas. Referring to the Home Ministry’s “General Policy Guidelines” relating to Indian Visa; there is no restriction on foreigners visiting religious places or attending religious activities in India.

The Government issued a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on April 2; about the transportation of foreign nationals stuck in India due to the COVID-19 pandemic. But a short press release on the same day caused no benefit to the Tablighi Jamaat followers.

Article 21 of the Constitution uses the word ‘person’ and not ‘citizen’; to protect a foreigner’s personal liberty, which includes free movement across the country. Therefore, the constitutional rights against preventive detention extend to foreign nationals also. Thus, the Supreme Court must declare the decision as unconstitutional and void – the petitioners assert.

Decision by the Apex Court

The bench considered the Centre’s affidavit; which stated the passing of individual orders for cancellation of visas of the foreign nationals. It further stated that the petitioners have the liberty to make representations; regarding the individual visa cancellation orders before the appropriate authority.

The bench consisting of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari & Sanjiv Khanna passed the order. The bench observed that as the government passed individual orders; the Petitioners should approach respective High Courts to challenge the cancellation orders.

Meanwhile, Senior Advocate CU Singh, counsel for the petitioners asserted that the individual orders for cancellation of visas were just for show. There was no issuance of a show cause notice so the government should deport them. However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta replied that there was no enforceable “Right to Return”; if there was any pendency of criminal cases against a foreign national.

The Apex Court has adjourned the next meeting till July 10 to allow the Petitioners to file their Rejoinder affidavits.

Ishan Harlalka
Ishan Harlalkahttp://lexinsider.com
I am a 3rd year law aspirant pursuing BA LLB. I am deeply interested in learning and am always looking forward to gain knowledge about new subjects. In my leisure time, I try to read books of various genres and by different authors. As people from non-law background may find it difficult to understand legal provisions and jargons, I try to write in a way that my articles are easy to comprehend and after reading them, one can discuss them with others.

CONTINUE READING

The case of Aruna Shanbaug that changed the Euthanasia laws...

0
It is my Belief that death is a friend to whom we should be grateful, for it frees us from the manifold ills which are our lot - Mahatma Gandhi. As human beings, out the umpteen desires that we have, one of them is definitely to have a peaceful death....

Justice D Y Chandrachud’s path-breaking Verdict in the Sabarimala Case of...

0
“Will the quest for equality and fraternity be denuded of its content where women continue to be treated as children of a lesser god in exercising their liberties in matters of belief, faith and worship? Will the pursuit of individual dignity be capable of being achieved if we deny...

After repealing section 377, its time to Legalise Same-Sex Marriage in...

0
A draconian, archaic law that criminalized homosexuality was struck down in a historic judgment given by the Supreme Court in 2018. Two years after the judgment, the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer) community has now sought legal recognition of their relationships. As the social stigmas surrounding the LGBTQ...

Modern Day Book Burning a.k.a Internet Shutdowns

0
The internet has become an indispensable element in our society for all the obvious reasons. For the majority of users, not a single day goes by where we don't 'need' the internet and the lack of a reliable and fast connection can feel paralyzing. An internet shutdown refers to...

Letter to UNHRC – Dr Kafeel Khan, Punished Because He’s Muslim

0
Kafeel Khan, a doctor by profession and a social activist has been targeted by Yogi Government since 2017, in 3 years he had been maliciously arrested 3 times & imprisoned for around 14 months on the false charges set up against him at many instances. Now he is absolved...

Prison Life In India and its Aftermath

0
Everyone prays to never see the bars of prison in their lifetime. Yet, as fickle as life is, it is quite hard to predict the future. It is in everyone’s benefit to know a little bit about prison life; for movies and cinemas do not do justice to the...