SCBA Secretary Calls For Extraordinary Meeting Against Dushyant Dave

There is a power struggle within the Supreme Court Bar Association after Ashok Arora, SCBA Secretary, called for an “extraordinary meeting”; to remove Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave from the post of SCBA President, and the primary membership of the Association.

Arora called for a meeting on May 11 under Rule 22 of the SCBA Rules; to discuss the following:

  1. To condemn the unauthorized resolution dated 25.02.2020 purportedly passed by the Executive Committee (through circulation) and immediately withdraw the same.
  2. Not to use the office of SCBA for political purposes.
  3. To remove Dushyant Dave from the post of President SCBA.
  4. To remove Shri Dushyant Dave from the primary membership of SCBA for working against the interest of the Bar.

The Executive Committee of SCBA passed the resolution criticizing the public remarks Justice Arun Mishra made in praise of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Justice Mishra said that PM Modi is a “versatile genius who thinks globally and act locally“; in his vote of thanks during the inaugural ceremony of the International Judges Conference on February 22, 2020.

Response By Dave

Therefore, Dave sent out the following message to the members-

“The entire exercise is illegal and improper. Moreover, EC has not decided to call any such meeting. So, whole exercise is unfortunate and wrong. It will have no purpose nor can it achieve any objective; except to tarnish reputation of this great body, SCBA. I am the President elected lawfully and will continue to serve you till my term is over. This attempt violates every cannon of procedure and law and has no legs to stand. You have elected me; and it is because of that I am serving you to the best of my abilities. Only you have power and right to act, not some person carrying personal agenda. Dignity and respect of this great institution, SCBA is at stake. So, please be informed that I will continue to serve you through my tenure; and will not be stopped by a motivated individual.”

The Resolution Of  February 25

In the controversial February 25 resolution, the SCBA expressed strong reservations against Justice Mishra’s remarks as such conduct intrudes upon judicial independence.

The SCBA believes that the Independence of the Judiciary is the basic structure under the Constitution of India; and that the preservation of such independence in letter and spirit. Most importantly, the SCBA believes that any such statement reflects poorly on the Independence of the judiciary; in addition, calls upon the Hon’ble Judges not to make statements in future; nor show any proximity or closeness to the Executive including Higher Functionaries,” the resolution stated.

However, Secretary Ashok Arora refused to sign the resolution. The Execution Committee of the SCBA said that such closeness may impact the decision-making process by the Hon’ble Judges; and may give rise to reasonable doubts in the minds of the litigants about the outcome.

Ishan Harlalka
Ishan Harlalka
I am a 3rd year law aspirant pursuing BA LLB. I am deeply interested in learning and am always looking forward to gain knowledge about new subjects. In my leisure time, I try to read books of various genres and by different authors. As people from non-law background may find it difficult to understand legal provisions and jargons, I try to write in a way that my articles are easy to comprehend and after reading them, one can discuss them with others.


The case of Aruna Shanbaug that changed the Euthanasia laws...

It is my Belief that death is a friend to whom we should be grateful, for it frees us from the manifold ills which are our lot - Mahatma Gandhi. As human beings, out the umpteen desires that we have, one of them is definitely to have a peaceful death....

Justice D Y Chandrachud’s path-breaking Verdict in the Sabarimala Case of...

“Will the quest for equality and fraternity be denuded of its content where women continue to be treated as children of a lesser god in exercising their liberties in matters of belief, faith and worship? Will the pursuit of individual dignity be capable of being achieved if we deny...

After repealing section 377, its time to Legalise Same-Sex Marriage in...

A draconian, archaic law that criminalized homosexuality was struck down in a historic judgment given by the Supreme Court in 2018. Two years after the judgment, the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer) community has now sought legal recognition of their relationships. As the social stigmas surrounding the LGBTQ...

Modern Day Book Burning a.k.a Internet Shutdowns

The internet has become an indispensable element in our society for all the obvious reasons. For the majority of users, not a single day goes by where we don't 'need' the internet and the lack of a reliable and fast connection can feel paralyzing. An internet shutdown refers to...

Letter to UNHRC – Dr Kafeel Khan, Punished Because He’s Muslim

Kafeel Khan, a doctor by profession and a social activist has been targeted by Yogi Government since 2017, in 3 years he had been maliciously arrested 3 times & imprisoned for around 14 months on the false charges set up against him at many instances. Now he is absolved...

Prison Life In India and its Aftermath

Everyone prays to never see the bars of prison in their lifetime. Yet, as fickle as life is, it is quite hard to predict the future. It is in everyone’s benefit to know a little bit about prison life; for movies and cinemas do not do justice to the...