NCLT Judicial Member Challenges Transfer Order in Delhi High Court

A judicial Member of the NCLT approached the Delhi High Court with a petition seeking a status quo on a transfer order. If effectuated, the Petitioner, Rajasekhar VK, would be transferred from the Mumbai Bench to the Kolkata Bench. The member challenged the order; on the grounds that it stands against the rules of transfer laid down by the Apex Court. The petitioner challenged another order; which, if effectuated, would allegedly result in a violation of the law. The order in question refers to the one which allowed the transfer of the Acting President of the NCLT to the Mumbai Bench. However, the surprising element remains the fact that the President signed the impugned order himself.

The Gordian Knot

According to the Petitioner, the Acting President of the NCLT, BSV Prakash Kumar, had violated the law on several accounts. The Petitioner had been appointed on the Mumbai Bench in May 2019; following which he stood instructed to transfer to the Kolkata Bench on May 12. Correspondingly, the President received an order of transfer himself, which posted him on the Mumbai Bench on May 12. The competent authority passed both the orders. In essence, implying that the President himself had ordered both the transfers. However, certain questions arise amidst this fog.

Points of Challenge

Order of September 2019 transferred the president to Chennai; from where he is operating ever since. Moreover, he himself had ordered his transfer, sitting on another bench. This was in clear violation of Rule 15A(2)(d) of the NCLT Rules. Furthermore, as the President of the NCLT, he is supposed to operate from the Principal Bench in New Delhi. This has been mentioned in Section 419 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013. He cannot enforce such a transfer order for himself while acting in such a capacity. As per Article 141 of the Constitution, such orders cannot be effectuated without consultation from the Law Ministry.

In addition, the Petitioner challenged the qualifications of the Respondent, stating dearth of appropriate experience. According to a Constitutional Bench judgement (UOI v. Madras Bar Association), the President must be either a sitting or former High Court Judge. However, Kumar is merely a District Judge, a point which has raised a few eyebrows.

The Petitioner urged the Court to appoint an ‘eligible member’ in the current President’s stead and have him operate from the New Delhi Bench.

CONTINUE READING

The case of Aruna Shanbaug that changed the Euthanasia laws...

0
It is my Belief that death is a friend to whom we should be grateful, for it frees us from the manifold ills which are our lot - Mahatma Gandhi. As human beings, out the umpteen desires that we have, one of them is definitely to have a peaceful death....

Justice D Y Chandrachud’s path-breaking Verdict in the Sabarimala Case of...

0
“Will the quest for equality and fraternity be denuded of its content where women continue to be treated as children of a lesser god in exercising their liberties in matters of belief, faith and worship? Will the pursuit of individual dignity be capable of being achieved if we deny...

After repealing section 377, its time to Legalise Same-Sex Marriage in...

0
A draconian, archaic law that criminalized homosexuality was struck down in a historic judgment given by the Supreme Court in 2018. Two years after the judgment, the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer) community has now sought legal recognition of their relationships. As the social stigmas surrounding the LGBTQ...

Modern Day Book Burning a.k.a Internet Shutdowns

0
The internet has become an indispensable element in our society for all the obvious reasons. For the majority of users, not a single day goes by where we don't 'need' the internet and the lack of a reliable and fast connection can feel paralyzing. An internet shutdown refers to...

Letter to UNHRC – Dr Kafeel Khan, Punished Because He’s Muslim

0
Kafeel Khan, a doctor by profession and a social activist has been targeted by Yogi Government since 2017, in 3 years he had been maliciously arrested 3 times & imprisoned for around 14 months on the false charges set up against him at many instances. Now he is absolved...

Prison Life In India and its Aftermath

0
Everyone prays to never see the bars of prison in their lifetime. Yet, as fickle as life is, it is quite hard to predict the future. It is in everyone’s benefit to know a little bit about prison life; for movies and cinemas do not do justice to the...